Kate Tempest is an extraordinary poet. She musters power and
depth and windows into humanity with such a brutal honesty and turn of phrase
that it’s impossible to remain untouched.
Her novel, The
Bricks That Built The Houses (US)
often reflects these strengths.
It opens with a burst of excitement. Harry, Becky and Leon
are leaving their home town with a bag of money and their hearts pounding like
crazy. They’re not safe. They’re on the run. South London is all they really
know. It’s a catchy start and an edgy one.
From this point on, we’re draw back to the beginning of this
tale – their journey from a late night meeting at a drug deal through to the
danger of what lies ahead.
Having established our main characters, the novel takes
regular tangents to fragment into vignettes of the bricks that built the
houses. There are back stories galore as we get to understand the lives of each
family member in some depth. Each of these pieces is well told and has enough
intrigue to pull a reader in. Though the key narrative gets lost through this
process, the book never loses its energy and drive. Lives overlap. We get to understand
that every person has a tale to tell. That the histories that are hidden well
beneath the surface are tough, exciting and incredible.
Each individual story forms a circle. When these circles
come together, they fill the canvas like a pointillist painting.
The simile there may be terrible, but it draws me to a key
element of the writing. The description here is stunning. Whether it’s the urban
landscape or the body that’s on view, the pictures are painted in such a way
that they burst from the page. It’s really quite something. It’s also something
that can get in the way of the plot on occasion and could maybe become stronger
with a touch of dilution.
I really enjoyed Bricks
a lot. I’d often stop reading and immediately want to pick the book up again,
which is always a good sign. That’s not to say it was perfect. In fact, there
are lots of flaws that are difficult to overlook.
The exploration of each character’s back story may be
well-handled, but the novel begins to feel the weight of all those tales by the
end. Momentum slows a good deal before sparking back into life at the
conclusion.
There’s also an issue with the range of character responses.
Too many of them experience the world in the similar ways. Their biologies are
almost identical. Their reactions could be interchangeable. Which, of course, may
be the point, who knows?
As the strands of the work came together and come close to
getting back to where things began, the energy fizzes and sparks. It’s a change
of pace that is welcome, but is also slightly incongruous. In many ways, if the
individual elements were surgically removed and reworked, there could be two
novels here, a well-paced crime drama and a literary gem.
All of those issues may have fallen to the back of my mind
had it not been for the ending. The ‘what happened next?’ element arrives and
drags down the energy so that it disappears even more quickly than it came. It
was something of a let-down and I’d rather have had the ultimate conclusion
left to my imagination.
Which all seems rather damning.
It shouldn’t. In spite of the things I feel were wrong, I
still found the read compelling and would recommend it without much
reservation. There are so many things to like and so many touches that need to
be experienced that I hope you’ll give it a try.
No comments:
Post a Comment