Showing posts sorted by relevance for query dancing with myself. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query dancing with myself. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, 27 November 2010

Dancing With Myself: RICHARD GODWIN interviews RICHARD GODWIN



Richard Godwin writes dark crime fiction, and he lets it slip the net like wash into horror.

His work has appeared in many publications, places like A Twist Of Noir and Pulp Metal Magazine, as well as in two anthologies. His story 'Pike N Flytrap' is in this Fall's issue of Needle Magazine. His play ‘The Cure-All’ has been produced on the London stage.

All his stories and poetry can be found at his blog here

http://www.richardgodwin.net/

His first crime novel ‘Apostle Rising’ is about to be published and will be released for sale onto the market on March 10th 2011. Use the link to watch a video ad of it.


DANCING WITH MYSELF.

Questions Six and Eight became reversed in transit, shaking may disturb the product.

1 England is sinking, its last hope was Billy Idol, who was the foxtrot maestro par excellence, he had the hair and he had the pelvic thrust he bought from an Elvis catalogue, and now we are left with this sewage problem, what do you think can save the nation from its moral malaise?

Option a: Better cleaning products, a clean home is a happy home, mm do I smell home cooking?

Option b: Analysing the system and looking at what writers have been trying to say for centuries.

2 Is life like a road map?

You’re handed coordinates early on through the tribe you belong to and maybe you learn the rules. Those rules might mean getting the right education and acting as a mirror to various familial needs. You’re inhabiting a power structure. Hemingway wrote in ‘The Sun Also Rises’ that they tell you the rules and then kick the shit out of you the first time they catch you off first base. The truth is there ain’t no maps. As Melville said, the only secret is there isn’t one.

3 Does sadness increase with age?

If grief is commensurate with loss and the proportions of denial. Denial of the reality of those about you until it is too late.

4 What makes a great actor?

The ability to immerse themselves in another’s skin, you have to suspend your ego to do that. Think of De Niro, he becomes the people he portrays and that is a tricky business. Think of the old greats like Richard Burton. Live on the edge of another’s skin until you can feel the insects creeping across it. So Lee Strasberg comes along and says walk the walk. Literally. And Brando had it. James Dean. Anthony Hopkins encapsulates all the great acting talents and then you have charisma. People play roles, they rehearse them in their private lives and become the good husband or boss or the bad guy or the entertainer. Acting is a version of this except professionals are impersonating others or non-existent people. If that doesn’t tell you a lot about humanity nothing will.

5 Do you think society is being socially engineered?

I think there have been many forces of social engineering from the eugenics practised by the Nazis, to the kind of power structures we are seeing in more subtle forms nowadays. Propaganda plays a huge part, as used by the media moguls. If you accept everything you read and take without question all the lies thrown at you you are being passed a bag of warm saccharined vomit and being told it’s gourmet food. Here darling taste this it’s fantastic. It’s been going on a while, hand your ticket to yourself at the door and sit down, we have all you can eat stacked over there and the funeral parlour’s round the corner. As

Steven Berkoff put it brilliantly in ‘Decadence’ ‘The mouth pink and raw once again, to receive like Gargantua its morsels of fun’.

Ben Jonson, probably the most underrated writer in world history simply because he was competing directly with Shakespeare, saw it vividly. Jonson could really write plots, and belongs to the bad guys, he killed twice, once in a duel and spent time in prison. His dialogue is some of the best ever written. He lets his characters use their own idiosyncratic forms of speech. As Sir Epicure Mammon says in ‘The Alchemist’ ‘I myself will have the beards of barbels with the fresh unctuous paps of a fat pregnant sow newly cut off and served in an exquisite poignant sauce.’ What are you being fed?

Stanley Milgram conducted an interesting psychological experiment which he wrote about in his book ‘Obedience to Authority’. Volunteers were recruited to take part in a memory test. They were told by a guy in a white coat that they needed to ask questions to unseen anonymous people behind a screen. If they got the answers wrong the volunteers had to administer an electric shock. Most of them went along with this, even though they heard screams from the other side.

The participants were all actors apart from the volunteers who knew nothing of the real basis for the experiment, which was a study in the psychology of obedience and power structures. No electricity was being administered. They went along with it because a figure of authority told them he would take responsibility for their actions. Someone else cannot take responsibility for your actions. Doctors save lives. They also misdiagnose and screw up.

Gunter Grass recently upset Germany by admitting he was in the Waffen-SS in the Second World War.

In ‘Peeling The Onion’ what he exposes is the way the power system worked in Nazi Germany. People knew. Of course they did. But the dissemination of the information was carefully engineered so that those at the fringes got only a little. He pissed a lot of people of saying it. He also outraged the intellectual establishment by black marking himself when respectability seemed to the the prize. Since when has the purpose of writing been to be to prop up moral rectitude?

6 Who calls the shots?

Billy Idol.

On the floor of Tokyo
Or down in London town to go, go
With the record selection
And the mirror's reflection

I'm dancing with myself
When there's no-one else in sight
In the crowded lonely night
Well I wait so long
For my love vibration
And I'm dancing with myself

7 Do you think politics has any interest in literature or art?

Go Back a few years to Nazi Germany, all they wanted was propaganda, they saw art as a vehicle for their announcements and that is how you spawn turgid laxatives.
The art they favoured as within post-Stalinist Russia was so unimaginative it was soporific and that is what dictators create. Stasis.

The manipulation of our perceptions is what you’re dealing with.

Control the information in such a way as to make people buy your product.

Do you think the Girl From Ipanima took Dulco Lax?

‘And when she passes, each one she passes goes – ah’.

I think it is almost impossible to create a decent work of art that has a political agenda. Preaching and narrative do not make good bed fellows.

The best authors who engage in politics as subject matter describe political events with a degree of detachment that is necessary to sustain a good narrative.

There is nothing to suggest the two are coupled. George Orwell was a great political novelist, and that is a rarity . He was highly prophetic but not an outstanding stylist, however what he was doing worked ideally for his form. He was a one off.
Politicians croon about their artistic tastes while leeching any funding artists may receive.

The modern political agenda in England has systematically raped arts funding and disgraced itself and its history with the politically correct agenda that rules it now.

As Frank Zappa said, and there is no better way of putting it ‘Political correctness is just another form of cowardice, no one will say what is on their mind any more’.
Do we really think we can legislate against thoughts? We’re back to Orwell and the thought police.

When a writer like Lynda La Plante, who has written some of the best most memorable crime drama for TV, criticises the BBC over its commissioning policies and their salaries and says: 'If my name were Usafi Iqbadal and I was 19, then they'd probably bring me in and talk' you know we’re in trouble.

What are they trying to do?

Nice day for a white wedding.

8 What are these interviews about?

Banks, pharmaceutical companies. Economic practices are tied hand and foot into the power structure set up by the pharmaceutical industry, look at the fiscal relationships between war and drugs, politics and power and you’ll get into the dark underbelly and I tell you this, it ain’t been washed down there in a long time. Tie in chemical weapons and you have yourself a bag of money, that’s the trip, economic manipulation for the guys at the top while they tax us.

Remember the CIA were laundering their money in Cuba just like the Mafia before Castro locked it in and good old England was hanging out the wash oversees. Follow your leader to the heap and whistle while you work cause they just made a dwarf of you. Most politics in England today has no political agenda, to use an American saying, it has sold itself down the river.

9 Do you think people are drawn to the lives of others?

If you watch TV and look at the kind of shows that draw the highest audiences then the answer would have to be yes. People seem to be fascinated by what is going on behind closed doors and that may be a form of narcissism in itself because most people have similar problems. Voyeurism is a cheap form of avoidance. It is arguable that what is behind this is the fragmentation of identity by the things I am talking about with perhaps too much passion for some, but a warning. If we don’t question what we are sold, no one else is going to pick up the pieces. Read the small print.

10 What is your novel ‘Apostle Rising’ about and when’s it coming out?

A psychopath is playing games with the police.

This guy knows a lot about an old case, a case that saw the biggest manhunt in England. And he’s smarter than the police. He’s also leaving no forensics.
In fact he’s recreating the original crime scenes and taunting Detective Chief Inspector Frank Castle, who failed to solve the old case. His failure resulted in him being savaged by the British Press.

Frank Castle knows a lot about serial killers but he just can’t get a reading on this one. He’s leading the investigation and it begins to erode his life. Not just his, but the life of his partner DI Jacki Stone. She’s tough and hungry but the darkness of what this killer is exposing them to starts to fragment them. Their training didn’t prepare them for this.

The killer is literally crucifying politicians.

Bu there’s something he’s leaving at the crime scenes that is harrowing to even the most jaded of cops.

The narrative has many twists and turns and some probing psychological analysis when the offender profiler employed by the police to catch the killer analyses what is motivating him. Imagine a Chin Wag with a killer. But this one takes the gloves off.

It’s also got a very nasty shock in it.

Here’s a plot summary.

Detective Chief Inspector Frank Castle never caught the Woodlands Killer and it almost destroyed him. Now years later, mauled by the press, and traumatised by nightmares, he is faced with a copycat killer with detailed inside knowledge of the original case.

He and his partner DI Jacki Stone enter a deadly labyrinth, and at its centre is the man Castle believes was responsible for the first killings. He’s running a sinister cult and playing dark mind games with the police. The investigation has a shattering effect on the lives of Castle and Stone. The killer is crucifying politicians, and he keeps raising the stakes and slipping through their hands. Dark coded ritualistic killings are being carried out on high profile figures and the body count is rising. Castle employs a brilliant psychologist to help him solve the case, and he begins to dig into the killer’s psyche. But some psychopaths are cleverer than others.

‘Apostle Rising’, is being published on 10th March 2011.

It will be available in book stores as well as from Amazon and book distributors.

It’s priced at £8.99 in the UK and $14.95 in the US as a paperback original.

My site contains information about it. You will be able to find out more as the release date draws near.

In the meantime this link takes you to a thirty second video ad for it:


http://richardgodwin.net/

And if you want to subscribe to the RSS feeds on my site, more information will be coming out about ‘Apostle Rising’. I hope you enjoy it.







Saturday, 1 September 2018

Dancing With Myself: SARALYN RICHARD interviews SARALYN RICHARD



In today’s “Dancing with Myself,” Saralyn Richard, author of MURDER IN THE ONE PERCENT (US) and NAUGHTY NANA, interviews herself.

INTERVIEWER:  Thanks for inviting us into your family room today. Lovely décor, and your Old English sheepdog, Nana, is quite lovely.

SR: My pleasure. Nana and I both enjoy having company. And I’m sure you’ve noticed that Nana is no longer naughty, as she once was.

INTERVIEWER:  So the children’s book, NAUGHTY NANA, is fact-based, then?

SR:  Yes, it is. Just picture the wildest, most mischievous puppy you’ve ever known, and that was Nana. She was in the top one percent of naughty dogs worldwide.

INTERVIEWER:  Speaking of the top one percent, let’s switch gears to your new murder mystery, MURDER IN THE ONE PERCENT. What made you decide to, er, switch gears from children’s literature to writing about murder?

SR:  It wasn’t really a huge leap, since there is a bit of a mystery to solve in NAUGHTY NANA, and if Nana hadn’t learned to be nice, there might have been a bit of a murder there, too. In truth, I was always on a road to be a mystery writer, and I’ve read and enjoyed an estimated ten thousand murder mysteries. The children’s book was a gratifying side path along the way.

INTERVIEWER:  So, (looking around the family room) I’m noticing that you don’t appear to be in the actual top one percent. Why did you choose to write about the ultra-wealthy, and how did you know so much about how they live?

SR:  You’re right. By some statistics, to be in the top one percent in New York City, one would have to have an annual income of $2,006,632. I would have to sell a lot of books to get there. I’ve always been fascinated by wealth and how it affects the people who have it, who don’t have it, and who had it and lost it. It took quite a bit of research to learn about the ways of the rich and powerful, but in general people were happy to help me write with authenticity. I even had the pleasure of attending an extravagant dinner party just like the one in the book.

INTERVIEWER:  Your book takes place in New York and in the horse country of Pennsylvania, yet many reviewers compare it to Agatha Christie’s British parlor mysteries. Can you explain why?

SR:  I suppose there are more cultural similarities than differences between ultra-wealthy men and women in England and in America. I binge-read Agatha Christie novels many years ago, and I suppose they left an imprint on my imagination. I also binge-watched Downton Abbey, and before that, Dallas. That long fascination with the wealthy I mentioned earlier apparently crossed the ocean and back.

INTERVIEWER:  Some readers have seen similarities between your characters and wealthy individuals who are in power in America today. Would you care to comment?

SR:  MURDER IN THE ONE PERCENT is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to people living or dead is purely coincidental…

INTERVIEWER:  That seems to roll off your tongue, but, really, are any characters patterned after real people?

SR:  Not in my mind. Remember, the book was written awhile ago, and people rotate in and out of the public eye over time. That said, I believe that once a book is published, it no longer belongs to the author. It belongs to the reader. So if a character resonates with a reader in a specific way and reminds him of a living person, far be it from me to shoot that down.

INTERVIEWER:  While we’re on the subject of characters, which character resonates most with you?

SR:  I was afraid you’d ask that question. It’s a little like asking which of your children is your favorite. Even if there is one, I’d feel guilty to name him. Truthfully, there is a piece of me in every character, even the most heinous. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be able to create him, give him actions, put words in his mouth. I am partial to all of them, but for different reasons. Preston Phillips, for example, is deliciously wicked. He says and does the most outrageous things, and he is so much fun to put on paper. Andrea and I share a number of characteristics, since she is a relatively down-to-earth crime writer, but I’m neither an equestrian or a billionaire, so the resemblance stops there. Detective Oliver Parrott, though African-American and male (neither of which am I), is probably the character who resonates most with me. He is clever and ambitious, has a strong moral compass, and approaches his job with a large dose of humanity. He’s not perfect, but he’s got a good heart and he works hard.

INTERVIEWER:  Congratulations on selecting a highly unusual murder weapon. Would you tell us how you came to use palytoxin?

SR:  I’m a person who faints at the sight of blood, so early on, I knew I wouldn’t have my victim mucked up. I purchased a book about poisons and read it from cover to cover, looking for one that would match the circumstances of my characters and plot. (My husband became a little anxious over my bedtime reading material.) With over a hundred different options, I couldn’t find a single poison that fit, and I was discouraged to the point of considering scrapping the whole idea. Then a friend of mine, who is a doctor, read about this “new” naturally-occurring poison whose symptoms look like a heart attack. It was perfect for the story.

INTERVIEWER:  You must be gratified with the excellent reviews MURDER IN THE ONE PERCENT is receiving. What’s next for you and for Detective Parrott?

SR:  Having a successful debut novel is a little like hitting the lottery on the first ticket. One might think that would be enough excitement to last for a lifetime, but actually, it just fuels the fire for the next book. I’ve completed a standalone mystery, and I’m working on another Parrott novel.  Both Parrott and I are just getting started.

INTERVIEWER:  Coming full circle, I can’t help but ask this last question. Why did you give Parrott a pet cockatiel, instead of a fluffy sheepdog like Nana?

SR:  Haha! It’s funny how every interview starts and ends with Nana. I considered having Nana make a guest appearance in MURDER IN THE ONE PERCENT, sort of like Hitchcock’s bits in his movies or Toulouse Lautrec’s images in his paintings, but it just didn’t seem practical for a detective who lived alone and worked crazy hours to care for a sheepdog, who requires constant attention and grooming. Horace, the talking bird, seemed a better fit for Parrott’s lifestyle. He was a gift from Parrott’s fiancée Tonya, and he serves as a kind of Greek chorus throughout the book. I checked with Nana before sending off the manuscript, and she was okay with sharing the spotlight. She likes her role as narrator of NAUGHTY NANA better anyway.

INTERVIEWER: Well, that concludes our interview for the “Dancing with Myself” column. Thank you for your time. I’ll just mosey back into the office now and work on a new chapter.


Saturday, 2 October 2010

Dancing With Myself: RICHARD JAY PARKER interviews RICHARD JAY PARKER

Those who've been here since the beginning will know that before 'Dancing With Myself' I posted a number of reviews/opinions on the blog.

Just now my spare time is taken up by the interviews (no complaints at all, I'm loving it), but I have had a couple postedon other sites.

If you pop over to http://tinyurl.com/37me7nl at the ever excellent Spinetingler you'll find me writing as part of a most excellent collection 'Requiems For The Departed'. It's not only an excellent collection, but the reviews are superb too, as each story has been reviewed by different people, each and every one of them knowing what they're talking about. I'd say it's a must visit.

I also wrote a piece for the delightful Patricia Abbott over at Pattinase http://tinyurl.com/35u7v6f as part of her Friday's Forgotten books legend. I chose 'Murder On The Yellow Brick Road' as my contribution to the series; if you want to know why, why not go along and find out.

And now today's main attraction, Richard Jay Parker. When you've read it you can visit his site and find out more about 'Stop Me' as well as being creeped out by some excellent music.



Here he is, Dancing With Himself.


RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Thanks for the coffee. That’s exactly how I like it.

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

You’re welcome. Shall we get started?

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Sure. Mind telling me why we’re in a café and why you didn’t want to conduct this interview at your place?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

I don’t really like inviting strangers into my home. Hope you’ll understand.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

I completely understand. I’m much the same. Can you at least tell me what’s occupying your time there at the moment?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

I’m working on stand alone thriller two. It’s been a process–

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

(Interrupts) Does it have a title?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Yes but it may change so I’ll sit on it for the moment. It’s been a process of trial and error with the second novel. I want to deliver something that will get the same sort of response as STOP ME.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Was it a surprise that STOP ME was short listed for the CWA John Creasey (New Blood) Dagger Award?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Thanks for mentioning that – and for remembering the name of the award so specifically. I was genuinely surprised to be short listed.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

I suppose being short listed is reward enough.

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

That’s what I keep telling myself.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

You’ve got some bagel crumbs on your shirt.

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

So have you

(They dust them away)

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

So what has surprised you most since having your debut novel published?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Aside from the TV interest?

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Which surely you’ve taken with a colossal pinch of salt…

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

A pillar. I think the thing that has genuinely surprised me is the amount of readers who have never heard of me before who have been willing to give the book a go.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Why would they do that?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

It’s a question I keep asking myself. There’s been a great response though and with Twitter and Shelfari I’ve had some pretty instant and creative responses.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Do you like interacting with readers…even if they didn’t a hundred percent like STOP ME?


RICHARD THE AUTHOR

It’s great when people say they were gripped by the story or blindsided by the twist but even readers who have issues with elements of the book – language, violence and the online aspects of the story for instance – it’s great to get so many different perspectives on it.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Do you think it’s now vital for writers to be so accessible?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

I personally enjoy it and I think it’s the very least you can do if somebody has splashed out their hard earned cash on your work – whether you’re an unknown like me or an established author.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

How else do you do this?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

As well as Twitter (@Bookwalter) I write a blog every Friday (http://www.thecurzongroup.blogspot.com/ )


RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

So that’s what you’re doing when I want to go down the pub.

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Sorry?

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

Nothing. So is your new novel going to be as dark and twisty as STOP ME?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

It’s a bigger story and it’s a little more macabre. Like the SPAM email from the serial killer in STOP ME it starts with an outwardly innocuous piece of technology that’s perverted for an evil purpose. This one is even more of a race against time though. I hope it has readers slamming the pages faster then before.

RICHARD THE INTERVIEWER

OK – I’m sick of talking about you. Can we talk about me now?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Sure. (Mobile rings) Sorry – got to take this.

(Gets up and walks over to corner of café. When he finishes he returns to find only two half full coffee cups)

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Where did he go?

CAFÉ WAITRESS

(Warily) Who?

RICHARD THE AUTHOR

Doesn’t matter.

(Empties one coffee cup into the other and sips self-consciously)



More info about Richard Jay Parker and STOP ME at http://www.richardjayparker.com/


http://www.amazon.co.uk/Stop-Me-Richard-Jay-Parker/dp/0749007079

Thursday, 7 October 2010

Dancing With Myself: GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD interviews GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD


Before the dancing begins, here's a list of interview postings for the weeks ahead.

Sunday 10th October - Tom Llewellyn

Monday 11th October - Alice Thomspon

Tuesday 12th October - Martin Edwards

Thursday 14th October - Brian Wiprud

Saturday 16th October - Vicki Delany

Sunday 17th October - Jedidiah Ayres

Saturday 23rd October - Benjamin Whitmer

Sunday 24th October - Charlie Stella

Tuesday 26th October - Graham Bowlin

Thursday 28th October - Jen Forbus

Saturday 30th October - Tim Hallinan

Sunday 31st October - Matthew McBride

And now to some dancing.

GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD is the Shamus and Anthony award-winning author of
eleven crime novels and numerous short stories. He has written six
mysteries featuring African-American private investigator Aaron Gunner;
two starring Joe and Dottie Loudermilk, retiree crime-solvers and
Airstream-owning parents to five grown Children From Hell; and three
standalone thrillers.

Gar has written for both the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, and for
such television shows as NEW YORK UNDERCOVER and THE DISTRICT. One of his
more recently published short stories---THE FIRST RULE IS---will be
featured in the 2010 edition of Best American Mystery Short Stories. His
latest novel is the urban crime drama CEMETERY ROAD, which Publisher's
Weekly has called, in its starred review, "a beautifully crafted novel of
unintended consequences."

Here he is, Dancing With Himself.

DANCING WITH MYSELF:
RAY SHANNON (AKA GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD) INTERVIEWS
GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD

RAY SHANNON: This feels weird. Does this feel weird to you?

GAR ANTHONY HAYWOOD: It does, yes. Especially this business of jumping back and forth between your chair and mine between every question and answer.

RS: Yeah. Exhausting, isn't it? Anyway, shall we get started?

GAH: Fire away.

RS: Let's start with why you write what you write, and why you can't seem to make up your fucking mind what you want to do. Over a 22-year career, starting in 1988, you've published six hardboiled mysteries featuring South-Central L.A. P.I. Aaron Gunner; two comic cozies starring Joe and Dottie Loudermilk, a pair of fiftysomething Airstream owners with five troublesome grown children; and one standalone crime novel.

GAH: Actually, I've written three standalones. Or, to be precise, you've written two---MAN EATER and FIRECRACKER---and I've written one, CEMETERY ROAD. Does that make any sense?

RS: No.

GAH: I didn't think so. Your question?

RS: Why all the changing up? Are you really as easily distracted at it would appear, or is there a method to your madness?

GAH: Well, some of those sudden changes in direction were forced upon me and some were deliberate choices. I've always wanted to operate in more than one sub-genre, so the Loudermilk series was something I took on after finishing my third Gunner book strictly to test my chops for comedy. As a change of pace and just for the stupid fun of it, I'd still be doing those books if the market had demanded it.
As for the two standalones you wrote---or rather, I wrote as you---or, no, I guess what we did, technically, was write them together...

RS: Jesus God, man, just get on with it.

GAH: MAN EATER and FIRECRACKER. Those two books were my take on the Elmore Leonard crime novel, the unpredictable, character-driven adventure yarn which, speaking strictly as a reader, is damn near the most entertaining kind of read there is.

RS: Publisher's Weekly called MAN EATER "the best Elmore Leonard rip-off since Elmore Leonard," as I recall.

GAH: Yeah. That was a blast. I had no problem being outed as someone trying to imitate the master, because hell, that was exactly what I was doing. But if I'd been accused of doing it badly, of dishonoring the form Dutch has almost single-handedly created, that would have really sucked.

RS: Were those books fun to write?

GAH: Um, shouldn't I be asking you that question?

RS: Oh, yeah. I guess you should.

GAH: So? Were they fun to write?

RS: Hell, yes. Enough so that I plan to do more. In fact, I'm working on a book right now---

GAH: Are you talking about QUEEN'S RUN?

RS: Yes.

GAH: Actually, you're not the one writing that. I am.

RS: Excuse me?

GAH: I probably should have informed you of this earlier, but the pen name experiment was a bust. I'll never write using a pseudonym again.

RS: Say what?

GAH: Don't take this personally, but you only exist because Putnam's thought putting your name on the books instead of mine would have a profound impact on how the major chains would treat them.

RS: And?

GAH: Apparently, to Barnes & Noble, you're just as big a loser as I am. So despite some great reviews, all I ended up with were two examples of some of my best writing that many of my fans still don't know I wrote.

RS: Can we talk about something else? This subject is pissing me the hell off.

GAH: Okay. Ask me something about CEMETERY ROAD.

RS: Your latest book, and another one I had nothing to do with, correct?

GAH: Correct. It's also another shift in direction, in the sense that, while it's my third standalone, it has more in common with my Gunner novels than my---your---Ray Shannons.

RS: Pray tell how so.

GAH: Its tone is dark and its setting is Gunner's inner-city Los Angeles. It's a gritty, urban noir, featuring a predominantly African-American cast, that follows two separate story lines separated by 26 years.

RS: Sounds like it should have been a bear to write.

GAH: It was. But from a challenge standpoint, it was also a great deal of fun. Jumping back and forth between one time frame and set of characters to another is quite a balancing act, especially when the story you're telling is a mystery that can't be fully resolved until the end. Your timing has to be perfect. One false step and the entire construct comes crashing down. Nobody did this sort of thing better than Ross McDonald. It was his work I had most in mind when I set out to write this book.

RS: How about porn?

GAH: What?

RS: If you won't write any more novels as me, how about some porn? Nobody uses their real name to write porn. Just ask Larry Block.

GAH: Could we move on? Or do I have to do the rest of this interview myself?

RS:

GAH: Oh, yeah. I guess I'm already doing that, aren't I?

RS: Your last Aaron Gunner novel, ALL THE LUCKY ONES ARE DEAD, was published way back in 1999. Is Gunner himself dead?

GAH: Not a chance. I plan to start my next Gunner book early next year.

RS: Got a working title yet?

GAH: LOSER DIGS THE GRAVES.

RS: Pet peeves. You wanna talk about pet peeves?

GAH: Comparisons to Walter Mosley. Book titles that are either mind-numbingly obvious or criminally unoriginal. Self-professed "hardboiled" or "noir" writers who think "bastard" is a perfectly acceptable alternative for "motherfucker." People who confuse mediocre books with great ones. Cover blurbs that read like they were written at gunpoint, i.e., "Haywood has a style few readers will fail to find unforgettable." Egomaniacal authors who approach the necessary evil of self-promotion like global terrorism. Farmville.
RS: Last question: Writers whose books read like a masters class in crime writing?

GAH: Martin Cruz Smith. Ace Atkins. Elmore Leonard. James Lee Burke. Donna Leon. Richard Price. Michael Connelly.

RS: And Ray Shannon?

GAH: Say goodnight, Gracie.

RS: Goodnight, Gracie.


http://www.garanthonyhaywood.com/


Saturday, 11 December 2010

Dancing With Myself: SEAN CHERCOVER interviews SEAN CHERCOVER



A little joy over at the wonderful DEATH BY KILLING where John Kenyon names his five favourite short stories of the year. Many thanks to you John; your picks put me in amazing company. It's worth tuning in there regulary as the recommendations are coming in thick and fast and every one of them has been fantastic to date.

And to today's interview.

Is it manners or music that maketh the man? Judge for yourself. Perhaps it's both.
Sean Chercover:


Q: Are you concerned about the voices in your head?

A: Not really. If I thought the voices were coming from a source other than myself, I’d be concerned. But I know you’re all just me, especially when one of you is interviewing me … and even when three or four of you are engaging in heated debate.

Q: But that’s a rare occurrence, isn’t it?


A: Dude, you’re in denial. You guys never shut the hell up. But it’s okay, I’m used to it by now. I really dig these lines by Walt Whitman: “Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes.”

Q: Oh God, Whitman’s a bore. And those lines sound like a bit of a cop-out, if you ask me.

A: Don’t start.

Q: Hey, this interview series is called Dancing With Myself – do you own a copy of the Gen X song?

A: I admit that I do, although I haven’t listened to in quite a while.

Q: What are the last five albums you listened to?

A: BACKATOWN, by Trombone Shorty. ONE DAY IT WILL PLEASE US TO REMEMBER EVEN THIS, by the New York Dolls. CUMBOLO, by Culture. TALK IS CHEAP, by Keith Richards & The X-Pensive Winos. GO FOR IT, by Stiff Little Fingers.

Q: Is that a fair representation of your taste in music?

A: It’s a fair representation of my taste in music over the last 24 hours. Don’t read more into it than that.

Q: It was an innocent question, man. Why so prickly?

A: Didn’t get enough sleep last night.

Q: Have you read Mark Billingham’s blog post “Thank You For Smoking” over at the Mulholland Books website? (http://www.mulhollandbooks.com/2010/09/14/thank-you-for-smoking/)

A: Yeah, it was very funny. And true. Lots of great posts over there.

Q: I guess I should ask a writing question. Where do you get your ideas?

A: I’m gonna slap you.

Q: I see we’re at Question #10—

A: No we’re not. #3 wasn’t a question.

Q: Back-off . Last question: What are you reading right now?

A: THE THOUSAND, by Kevin Guilfoile. Loving it.

Q: On behalf of Sean, I’d like to thank Nigel for hosting us at his blog…

A: I can speak for myself. Thanks to Nigel for hosting me at his blog.

http://www.chercover.com/

Saturday, 28 August 2010

Dancing With Myself: JON JORDAN interviews JON JORDAN



A fanfare if you will. Blaze the trumpets, toot those horns. We're about to begin the series 'Dancing With Myself'.

Fitting, I think, that we kick off with a selfless dude, a man who boosted my confidence and raised my profile by taking me on for Crimespree Magazine. And if that helped me, think of how many others who've put their feet in his hands for a bunk-up.

Here's Jon Jordan (aka Crimepspree Jon) interviewing Jon Jordan (aka Crimespree Jon). He starts with a firecracker question - what would you expect?

Who the Hell are you and just what is it you do and why should we care?

I publish Crimespree Magazine with my wife, we cover crime fiction on screen and in print. We've even covered it in music and on stage. So if you dig crime fiction you should probably send me a check so I can send you the magazine. I'm also involved with Bouchercon, helping in the past and this year and running it next year with David Thompson of Busted Flush and McKenna Jordan of Murder by The Book. See also Murder and Mayhem in Muskego.

Why do you do this?

We want to let people know about books and DVDs they might overlook. We love this genre and want to do what we can in our own small way to help it prosper. There is so much out there we want to make sure our favorites don't get passed over.

How much caffeine do you actually take in each day?

3-4 pots of coffee and 3-4 energy drinks is average. And no, I don't sleep much and I prefer it that way. I'll sleep when I'm dead.

What's the best part of running Crimespree?

I love hearing from readers when we turn them on to new authors and they go and get all the books. I also love hearing from authors when they see coverage and it makes them happy. Having people tell us they bought something they might not have normally picked up means what we want to do is actually working.

Ebook or print?

Don't get me started. I prefer print. But I also believe that the future is a combination of the two working together, not one or the other. E books are a PART of the future, but not the whole future of publishing.

Favorite movies? (We know better than to ask about favorite authors)

I love The Godfather 1&2, Buckaroo Banzai, The Great Escape, LA Confidential, lots of noir.

New author to watch for?

Hilary Davidson (http://www.hilarydavidson.com/ ) I predict good things. Her first novel is great. I also really like Stephen Jay Schwartz.

Trends or topics you are sick of?

Lots. I'm tired of every book being labeled a thriller, I don't want any more books with the word Templar, and I am REALLY sick of people writing about the death of print and publishing just to get people to a blog or website.

You read a lot of comics in addition to novels. Why?

I think some of the best crime fiction today is in comics. Scalped, 100 Bullets, the Vertigo Crime Line. I also like a lot of other comics and they are a nice quick read between novels. One of my favorites is Beast of Burden (Now out in hardcover!)


What's coming up in Crimespree?

Denise Mina on the next one, Don Winslow is coming to the cover, JA Konrath and Blake Crouch, after that, we'll see what grabs us.

http://www.crimespreemag.com/

Saturday, 12 February 2011

Dancing With Myself: LJ SELLERS interviews LJ SELLERS


"More love for DIRTY OLD TOWN
Just can't help myself. I want more people to buy Nigel Bird's Dirty Old Town and read it and love it and tell others about it. I was surprised by every story. These are short, punchy, thoughtful, hard as a punch, but sometimes they dig in and squeeze. It's dirty stuff, done beautifully.Nigel is also responsible for the too-cool "Dancing With Myself" interview series at his blog, Sea Minor.”
Anthony Neil Smith (Yellow Medicine, Psychosomatic, Hogdoggin')

WOW.

Least I could do was to give one of his books a space (eyes right)>>>.

Truth be told, comments like that can never be taken away and give me such a lift I find it impossible to explain.

Our guest today has had a hell of a lot of good feedback and that might help to explain the way she's flying high in the Amazon Kindle charts on both sides of the Atlantic. Readers and writers, ATTENTION.

Q: What motivates a novelist to participate in a blog like this? Being both the interviewer and subject?

A: Control and ego! It’s an opportunity to say exactly what we want about ourselves and our work. Who could pass that up?

Q: There are hundreds of crime stories out there, why should anyone make time to read yours?


A: I believe my stories are a good balance of what readers want. They combine realistic crimes with complex plots. I do enough character development to engage readers but without sidetracking the story. I write about provocative social issues as an intrinsic component of the plot, so the story has meaning. But I do it in subtle ways that leave readers thinking. Most important, I keep the pace moving. Besides, Mystery Scene magazine says you should be reading my work.

Q: You write a series about a homicide detective, is there a formula to your plots?

A: Not at all. Each of my Detective Jackson stories is unique. The crimes are all different, and each story has its own structure with different POV characters. In the first book, The Sex Club, I had two main protagonists, a Planned Parenthood nurse and Detective Jackson. In Secrets to Die For, I opened the story from the victim’s POV, then told most of the rest from Jackson’s perspective, with a reporter having a small part. In Thrilled to Death, women go missing and the body doesn’t appear until halfway through. In my last release, Passions of the Dead, the story opens with a mass murder, and I tell a parallel subplot through the eyes of the victims.

Q: Which book was most challenging to write and why?

A: The Sex Club was especially challenging, because the timing of events had to be perfect to pull off the ending, which readers are still talking about. Some even e-mailed me to say they read the ending over and over. But the book I’m working on now, affectionately called “Jackson 5,” is proving to be even more difficult. In this story, I have two separate investigations going and they both involve crimes of the past. It’s very challenging to craft an investigation with no crime scenes, no bodies, and no autopsies. But I’m halfway there, and I believe I’ll pull it off.

Q: Enough about your books. It’s time for some personal questions. What do you do for fun when you’re not writing or promoting?

A: I love cycling and I bike year round. And anything that gets my adrenaline going is fun for me, so I’ve been parasailing, gone up in hot air balloon, and jumped out of an airplane. For affordable everyday fun, I shoot pool with my husband and go bowling with my brothers.

Q: Until recently, what was your day job?

A: I’ve worked as a journalist/editor for magazines and educational publishers for most of my career. I spent seven years on a pharmaceutical magazine and know more about drugs than I should. I finally ended up with a part-time newspaper job writing features, which was perfect. Then they laid me off as a cost-cutting measure. I used my down time wisely, and now I’m a full-time novelist.

Q: What are some of the strangest jobs you worked as young person and how did they affect your life and your writing?

A: In high school, I worked in the meat department at a local grocery store. Boy was that a stinker! It made me realize I needed to go to college, even though we had no money. In college, I had a job as a vacuum cleaner sales person. That ended when my boss kissed and groped me. That experience made me realize that perverts are everywhere, which is why they come up in my books. I also pulled green chain for six months. I lost 20 pounds and realized I could do almost anything a man could do, but I was smarter than that, so why should I?

Q: If you’re such a tough woman, why do you write about a male homicide detective?


A: When I wrote The Sex Club, I wasn’t sure it would be a series, but I was sure that I needed two main characters: a Planned Parenthood nurse and a homicide detective. The nurse had to be a woman, so I made the detective a male for balance. The detective had to be the one to carry the series forward, so I ended up with a male protagonist. Fortunately, it’s also realistic for him to be male. There are no female detectives in Eugene’s violent crimes division. But a female sergeant runs the unit, so my character’s boss is woman.

Q: What is the most challenging aspect of writing a series?

A: Character arc. If your characters change too much, your readers will be disappointed and lose interest. If they don’t change at all, reviewers and readers will ding you for that too. So Jackson’s changes are subtle, and they are also organic to the plots. His circumstances—such as his relationship with Kera, his ex-wife’s involvement with his daughter, and his home arrangement—are changing slowly too. I may move him forward in one novel, then move him back in the next. But that’s how it is. Jackson’s life is complicated and stressful, like most of ours.

Q: What other amazing things have you done besides write novels?

A: After I graduated from college, I rode my bike to the Grand Canyon (from Eugene Oregon), including crossing Donner Pass. It was a three-day 10,000-foot climb. When we reached the top, a blizzard was happening and ten feet of snow had already piled up at the side of the road. We spent two days in Truckee waiting for the snow to stop. Then we rode down the mountain into Reno, with snow, ice, and gravel on the road. It was the most terrifying 45 minutes of my life.
To get to find out a little more about LJ or to take a look at her book, follow the links below.

http://ljsellers.com


Monday, 11 October 2010

Dancing With Myself: MARTIN EDWARDS interviews MARTIN EDWARDS



Today we're very fortunate to have Martin Edwards with us. He's a writer of stature and a blogger extra-ordinaire. He's a bit like a pedigree racehorse or a classic wine - sleek and tasty (not sure where I'm going with this - help!). Perhaps I'd do better handing straight over, but do yourself a favour and pop over to his blog (reviews, issues, information, you name it).


1 Do you see yourself mainly as a lawyer or a writer?

A writer, first and foremost!

2. Then why become a lawyer?

I always wanted to be a novelist - and specifically a crime novelist - but of course I needed to pay the mortgage as well, and I was lucky enough to find that I enjoyed being a lawyer, and enjoyed writing about the law. My first four books were on legal topics, simply because it was easier to get published with non-fiction than fiction.

3. Does your legal knowledge help you to write crime?

Criminal law is interesting in theory, but I’d hate to do it in practice. Rapists, paedophiles and muggers certainly have to be defended in a civilised society - but not by me. Employment law is a fast moving field, and has plenty of social and political significance - strikes, discrimination, working conditions, these things are relevant to most people in some way. Above all, employment law involves understanding and trying to solve issues arising in human relationships. This is where the link with the concerns of the novelist comes in, rather than in the technical legal subject matter. Though employment lawyers did feature to some extent in my stand-alone novel of psychological suspense, TAKE MY BREATH AWAY.

4. Do you identify with Harry Devlin in your Liverpool books?

Some people have suggested that Harry Devlin, the Liverpool lawyer who appeared in my first seven novels and later in WATERLOO SUNSET, is a fictionalised version of me. All I can say is, thank God he isn't! But I do enjoy writing about Harry and his misadventures. WATERLOO SUNSET in particular was a joy to write.

5. Do legal themes play a major part in your work?

Justice is important to me, and to Harry, and being involved with opportunities to see justice done is one of the appeals of being a lawyer. But you have to be realistic about what is achievable. You have to act in your client's best interests, whether you approve of your client personally or not. I wrote a novel about Dr Crippen, DANCING WITH THE HANGMAN, which tackles the question of justice head-on, and I found it a wonderful experience to research and write that particular story. It was very different from my other work, but I always believed in the story, and the reviews were tremendously gratifying.

6. What appeals to you about writing a series?

There are plenty of possibilities with a novel for the dissection of society, but perhaps even more if you write a series. My Liverpool series showed a fascinating city in transition over a period of years. My series set in the Lake District deals, perhaps more broadly, with the tensions between urban society and rural tradition, and the pressures on the countryside and rural ways of life in England. This is especially the case in the fourth and latest book in the series, THE SERPENT POOL. I've been interested in the positive way overseas readers have responded to the 'Englshness' of the books. I enjoy this aspect of writing, but I also enjoy the delineation and exploration of character, and creating a complex and unusual mystery. Above all, I like telling enjoyable stories - I genuinely find it exciting to write the last few chapters, when all becomes clear. At least, I enjoy the stories, and I hope other people do as well.


7. How important to you is research?

Of course it's desirable to avoid making mistakes. So if you are going to write about a legal topic, it's sensible to research it (and I researched DANCING WITH THE HANGMAN, for instance, with enormous care.). And it’s great ‘having’ to go to the Lake District to research the world of Hannah Scarlett and Daniel Kind! But you can write a good novel which skirts round stuff you don't want to research - for instance, police or courtroom procedure, if you find that boring. You can be selective, and focus on subjects you do know enough about to write confidently and without error. But when mistakes are made, it grates, and can lose you readers. I once watched a tv series about an employment lawyer which was hopelessly inaccurate. Though I have to admit that many employment lawyers watched it, simply to amuse themselves at the expense of the actors and script writer.


8. What was the first crime novel you ever read?

THE MURDER AT THE VICARAGE by Agatha Christie which I read aged 9. Start at the top!

9. And the most recent you read?

STARTED EARLY, TOOK MY DOG by Kate Atkinson. Really entertaining and very funny.

10. Finally, what have been the highlights of your writing career to date?

Winning the CWA Short Story Dagger for ‘The Bookbinder’s Apprentice’, being shortlisted for best crime novel of 2006 for THE COFFIN TRAIL and being elected to membership of the Detection Club.

http://doyouwriteunderyourownname.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, 18 May 2011

Dancing With Myself: DECLAN CONNER interviews DECLAN CONNER

At about this time last year, I found out that I was the winner of the WATERY GRAVE INVITATIONAL competition.  I can't put into words exactly what it meant to me; suffice to say it was a point in my writing life when I no longer felt the need to add clarification if I ever mentioned to anyone that I was a writer.

The fact that the winner the year before had been Hilary Davidson made it all the sweeter.

When the wonderful Naomi Johnson contaced me a couple of weeks ago to see if I wanted to take my place in this year's contest, I had mixed feelings.  The first was great pride.  The second was fear.

In the end I felt that the pros outweighed the cons.   I didn't want to feel like I'd backed off like a nervy sportsperson feigning injury and I do like the idea of the stimulation the contest offers.

Now the list is out at the Drowning Machine, I'm wondering if I shouldn't have pulled the 'dodgy hamstring' line out of the bag.  The list is intimidating and quite amazing. 

It's not the winning, it's the taking part they say.  To all of us involved, good luck and let's enjoy the zing of rubbing such a lot of talented shoulders.

Yesterday I had a tough teaching day.  There are times when working with children can drain everything out of you. 

Thankfully, a review of Dirty Old Town by the enigmatic Sabrina Ogden put the spring back in my step.

I'll be over at My Friends Call Me Kate with a piece on punch-lines, so I hope I'll see you there.

Today's Dancing With Myself interview is by a writer who is doing rather well with his e-books.  Declan Conner came up with the excellent idea of writing mysteries for lunch-breaks and it works really well.  Coming up with the concept is never enough on its own, so it's nice to have the quality there to back up the idea.

Here he is, the charming Declan Conner.



Dancing with yourself: DECLAN CONNER interviews DECLAN CONNER



Do you think you're mad to agree to interview yourself?


At first the notion skipped through my mind, but then I thought, Why not, I've had some practice from developing my serial killer's character.


Survival Instinct, (The dark side of dating,) the name of your book. Does it get confusing having two titles?


Not really, Survival Instinct is the name of the thriller series. The dark side of dating gives you an idea of the theme. The book is the first of the series. The second book, Russian Brides is almost complete and will be released in late July/August.


Does Survival Instinct fit neatly into a slot on the genre bookshelf?


I would say so, If were to expand on the thriller tag, I think the best description would be as a psychological, serial killer, mystery thriller.


So it's all blood and guts.


No there is more depth to it than that, although it has its share of characters brought to life (and to death). It's a sort of a Two and a Half Men meets Psycho.


Don't you think there are enough serial Killer books on the market? What makes yours different?


Well, I don't have my 'Crossword Killer' leaving things in every orifice, or skinning his victims. A serial killer is what he is and just that ... a scumbag.


'Crossword Killer'. You mean he kills crosswords. That's different.


Don't be so stupid, I knew you'd say that. I suppose it comes from our being on the same wavelength.


Wait a moment; I nearly missed something, Two and a Half Men and Psycho? How do you justify mixing humor with death?


It's not a question of justifying it; I like to take the reader through a whole raft of emotions as the story develops. If I were to shock them at every turn of the page, I would have to change the genre to horror.

 So what's the story about? (Yawn)


Well, as I said, it's a mystery thriller, so I can't give too much away. Having said that, I give the reader all the serial killer's motives in the first chapter, but I don't tell them who he is. It is then for the reader to discover which of the characters I introduce who could be the killer. As the story develops, I add another dimension to the mystery as to why the killer appears to be stalking my main character, Jamie Jameson and implicating him in the murders he commits.


Hero or villain?


Hero for me. Jamie is the type of guy women will want to take home, to put him under their wing, and to give him a big hug. The guys may see him differently and want to give him a kick in the pants for his naivety with women. One thing is for sure, they'll both want him around when things get tough.


So where does Survival Instinct come into it?


Surviving life is something we all have to face in everyday modern life, whatever your gender. Particularly if you're middle aged and single. Many faced with divorce, or the breakdown of a relationship, have to overcome fears and self-doubt when cast out of the safe cocoon of a relationship to start life again. Survival instinct comes from meeting those hidden fears head on and for some it is not easy. This is especially true for my main character.


Jamie is newly divorced and coerced to join the local singles' club by his work colleagues. Instead of finding a woman, he finds a friend in Bill, a womanizer and his alter ego to Jamie's bashful nature. They make for a fun team with their antics, trawling the local dating scene. But danger is never far away. Needless to say, the stakes are raised when the local police chief, Detective Hogan and FBI agent Hammond go after Jamie as the main suspect, after the women he dates start turning up as corpses. But just what the CIA have got to do with the case and why the serial killer would take hostages to lure Jamie into a showdown with the cryptic messages he leaves, I'll leave you to find out as it heads for an explosive ending.


What's the best compliment you have had from a reader? And the worst?


The best was from a lady author when she said. "Freakin' awesome, you must have had so much fun writing and developing the characters of Jamie and Bill. I couldn't put the read down. I was reading it on my computer and on my iPod on the train and at work. I want everyone to know this is a gem that keeps you guessing the outcome until the end."


The worst was from a forum troll. it read, "Give up writing."


Why is it so cheap? Was the forum troll nearer the mark?


Lol, I hope not, I spent a year having the work in progress critiqued over 1,000 times on an author site before putting to a professional editor. The price reflects a motivation to reach as wider audience as possible.


Is this the only book you have published?


No, I have Lunch Break Thrillers, a compilation of not so short mystery thrillers. I published the book in February and it hit the bestseller rank for its category in the UK. It's quite a Buzz, being sandwiched between Stephen King and Agatha Christie. (In the charts that is).


Just one last question. You haven't treated this interview like a psychological test, by telling me what you think I want to know, rather than the truth?


Who ... me? I'm as straight as my plot twists.


That's what I figured; I suppose I'd better ask where we could buy it.












Monday, 13 September 2010

Dancing With Myself: CHRIS RHATIGAN interviews CHRIS RHATIGAN


A quick note about who's added their weight to the 'Dancing With Myself' series. Jason Michel of Pulp Metal, Brian Wiprud and Gar Anthony Haywood are in. It's getting hotter in here by the minute.


I'm also going to be juggling a little over the week ahead. On Thursday come and say hi to Gerald So, Friday/Saturday to Steve 'Needle' Weddle and on Monday Man Booker shortlisted Emma Donoghue.


And so to today.Chris Rhatigan is doing a great service for the writers of short fiction.


He's reviewing the short form, from flash to novella, planting signposts to where we should be headed and who to check out. Thank goodness he's out there - we'll hear a lot more from him in the near future, I'm sure.



You have a blog about short crime fiction. Why?

Well, I saw Nasty, Brutish, Short, which was the only place dedicated to short crime fiction reviews. They do an excellent job, but I thought there was room for one more, so I fired up Death by Killing.

And I was reading a lot of really kickass fiction (mostly online, though some in print) and wanted a place to talk about it, recommend stuff I like. Sometimes I’ll go all professor on your ass and talk craft—an area where I clearly have no idea what I’m talking about.

How did you get into crime fiction?

When I was in middle school, I was reading Robert B. Parker and the thrillers of Michael Crichton and Tom Clancy. Later I started reading a lot of literary fiction, but that business got boring. I mean, John Updike can only write about disaffected, suburban men who cheat on their wives so many times before I start hitting the snooze button.

Sorry, John Updike, you suck.

Which is why I picked up a Parker novel again a couple of years ago, followed it up with Raymond Chandler and Harlan Coben, and it was a downhill slide from there.

Whose work are you enjoying most right now?

I really am amazed (and, when I submit work, saddened) by how much quality shit is out there.

If I had to pick one author right now, it would be Christopher Grant. The Greta stories are badass, Bus Stop is a tight, perfectly constructed piece of flash, and Ashley is the best lesbian crime story I’ve read.

There are so many goddamned writers out there with their fancy Mac laptops and their pretend poverty and their armchair philosophy and their community gardens. Why the fuck do you think you could possibly have anything to say that hasn’t already been said in exactly the same way . . . you arrogant, fascist prick?

I have no idea.

I guess I write for myself. I love the problem-solving aspect of working on a story. A finished product makes me feel good.

And because I keep reading quality, original stuff, so I figure there’s always more out there to be discovered.

What are you working on right now? Anything hitting the virtual stands soon?

I’m working on some short horror and revising other work.

In the fall, I’ll have a short story, “Double Bounce,” coming out in Mysterical-E. I also have a short-short about a retail worker at the end of his rope coming out in the Yellow Mama December issue.

And I’m up for 623 words at entry #623 at ATON. I have an idea for it but, as of yet, no execution.

I see you live in Iowa City. Are you involved with that Writer’s Workshop thing at all?

No. I graduated from SUNY Purchase, then worked as a newspaper reporter for four years. Now I’m back in school, studying to be a high school social studies teacher.

http://death-by-killing.blogspot.com/

Sunday, 6 March 2011

Dancing With Myself: HELEN FITZGERALD interviews HELEN FITZGERALD



Brian Lindenmuth described Helen Fitzgerald as Allan Guthrie with ovaries. What a tag that is.

I’m interviewing myself at my desk in Hope Street Studios in Glasgow, a genius space for creative types, the brainchild of colourist Jamie Grant. Artists, fashion designers and novelists shame each other into working here and offer friendly and unpretentious water cooler conversations to those who would otherwise rot away in their lonesome attic spaces at home. Love it.

What, I ask myself, am I working on at the moment?

After an unproductive 2010 - for some reason my thinking powers took an extended holiday - I am bursting with ideas and in full swing again. Today I've been working on my next adult book, as yet untitled. My son disapproves of the idea for this book wholeheartedly as it sounds darker and sadder and more twisted that the four already published. He asked me to write something with joy in it. I told him I will, but she will die horribly.

I've also been working on a radio play idea based on the donor my fifth book, published this July by Faber and Faber and on feature articles to promote the book. I’m hoping my new room-mate, Lesley McDowell, will inspire me in relation to the latter, as she’s an experienced journalist and author. Also hoping my other room-mate, designer Camille will make some clothes that make me look younger than 153.

In a few weeks, my husband (Sergio Casci) and I will do another draft of the screenplay for The Devil’s Staircase,as we’ve now got Aussie producers (MacGowan Films) co-producing with Synchronicity Films. When I say another draft, I mean we’re upping the thriller element, and when I say “my husband and I” I mean “my husband”. I’ll make the coffee and Aussify it with references to cheesles, chocolate teddy bear biscuits, eucalyptus trees and words like daggy. We also have the excellent job of watching a pile of Aussie films to check out potential directors and cast.

So, Helen, Does the writing process change once you’ve written several books?

It does actually Helen. It becomes less fun. I suppose I know I can reach the end of a story now, so the surprise (OMG I am an utter genius) element has gone. Also, I know exactly how much work is involved – a lot – and a slight feeling of dread enters the scene when I set to work. I find myself wondering: Am I ready to think about nothing else for six to twelve months? To fall asleep, dream, and spend all day thinking about it? Do I have the stamina? Do I have enough ideas?

Which brings me to my next question: Where has the idea for the next book come from?

The next book is set down under. I’ve wanted to do this for a while, but hadn’t found the right story. This one’s about a couple who accidentally kill their baby. Without realising it, both parents have given the newborn painkillers on the long haul flight from Scotland to keep him sedated, and discover he is dead as they drive from Melbourne to Geelong. For many reasons, they decide to cover it up. Not surprisingly, this cover-up is a bad idea. I’m writing it from the POV of the parents, and hope that the reader feels some sympathy for them as the situation unfolds and escalates.

What has surprised you about being a full time writer?

Several things. The amount of work I have to do to promote myself, for example. I hadn’t used the Internet much beforehand, and now find myself navigating the terrifying world of facebook, twitter, blogs and podcasts. I’ve always been scared of spiders, and I feel like the hairy legs



of the Internet have invaded my life. Gotta get with it, though, and am attending a day in Edinburgh this week, organised by my agent at Jenny Brown Associates, which is designed to help authors promote themselves online. At first, I had a bit of an addiction to Amazon rankings and self-googling. That has subsided now. If anything, I avoid it, even though I do have a much thicker skin than I used to have.

The other aspect that has surprised me is how supportive and fun the writing world is in Glasgow and in the international world of crime fiction. I’ve met so many writers, made so many friends, and finally feel I am in the right job, with the right colleagues. NB: Crime writers are the best - unpretentious, a good laugh, non-competitive, generous and helpful.

Now, back to that twisted novel. Ideas for titles welcome (Best suggestion so far is from my hairdresser - THE NAP).

Saturday, 25 September 2010

Dancing With Myself: KELLI STANLEY interviews KELLI STANLEY


Over the last few days, a number of people have booked slots in the series. I'll maybe list some of those to look forward to soon.

Today, I'd like to introduce Kelli Stanley.

First off, I've read City Of Dragons and am going to recommend it to everyone here. It introduces a phenomenal new PI, Miranda Corbie (fast talking, quick thinking, rebellious, street-wise, alluring and with lots of hidden depths) and she's a lady I want to hear more about. Soon as I read that she'd been to Spain to fight in the civil war I was on her side. She is a refreshing variation on a wonderful theme.

If you're not sure about taking my opinion at face value, here's someone else's:

“Kelli Stanley’s CITY OF DRAGONS blew me to ribbons.

From the opening chapter, we’re rooting for Miranda, a marvelous, feisty, compassionate heroine who is my favourite P.I. to come down the mean streets in oh, so long.

Superb characterisations … and a story to make you weep. Fathers will never seem quite the same again. From the opening quote by Cornell Woolrich, we’re off and gasping, and not just from the lovely evocations of another era of Chesterfields.

Polish up the Shamus, I know where it’s headed this year.”

Ken Bruen


Second, she's asked herself some top questions and opened up in the answers.

Stick with it and you'll learn some Latin, too.

Please welcome to Sea Minor, Kelli Stanley

Dancing with Myself

1. First century Roman Britain and 1940 San Francisco? Two series? Are you insane?

Aren’t all writers? I’m a Gemini, which explains some of it. It also explains how I’m able to interview myself.

I’ve never been able to settle down to just one thing. Drama major? Check. Film major? Check.

My senior year in high school I was determined to become a Cosmo Chemist. I finally fell into a double major in Classics and Art History and earned an MA in Classics because the field was broad enough to hold my interest. I even got the chance to bring comic books into it.

2. Comic Books? Does this mean you want to write them? Where do they fit in?

Before earning my MA, my family and I owned and operated a comic book/pop culture store in San Francisco. I LOVE comic books (call them graphic novels if it sounds better). And yes, I’d love to write a noir-styled superhero comic for DC and bring back some of the old Quality and Fawcett characters from the ‘40s.

3. Speaking of noir … and I must speak of noir … both of your series stretch and redefine the boundaries of the genre. How do you handle the noir elements in each?

The Miranda Corbie series recasts the classic noir paradigm … with a femme fatale in the gumshoes. A kind of restyling of hardboiled fiction, but without the censorship of the classic era. I love the ‘30s and ‘40s, and I want to capture the period in its stunning beauty … as well as its visceral, almost unconscious brutality. City of Dragons and City of Spiders—which will be out next fall—are dark books, dealing with human suffering in an indifferent world. Miranda’s a fighter, though, which is the point. Noir isn’t necessarily about despair—despair’s easy. Noir can be about dealing with the despair, coping with it and trying to make the world a better place.

The Roman noir series is a lighter and more playful homage to the style of Raymond Chandler, with more humor, and not as psychologically dark. The Curse-Maker was inspired by two Hammett classics, actually, though the style is very Chandleresque … Red Harvest and The Thin Man.

So both series use and adapt noir elements in different ways, and both, I think, offer something new and distinctive.

4. They’re also both historicals. Why history? Don’t you want to write contemporary fiction?

Well, here’s the thing. History gives me a chance to make social commentary, because it can act as a metaphor for present events. It also allows me to give something extra to the reader … a way to think about the past, and hopefully understand that history is not a separate entity, cut off from the present, but a continuum and explanation for how we got here. I like challenging assumptions about history, since there’s a prevailing attitude that somehow people were different “back then.”

Societal mores may change, but humanity itself has changed very little in the last couple of thousand years.

But of course, given my answer to question #1, I want to write other things, too. A contemporary stand-alone noir thriller, set in Humboldt County, for one.

5. So coming back to history and people and attitudes … is Miranda Corbie, your tough-talking, hard-drinking and constantly smoking protagonist in City of Dragons really a woman of her era?

Great, ask me the hard questions, why don’t you … ;)

Miranda is a woman of her generation in many ways, but she’s also a remarkable individual. This was a period when women accomplishing the previously unimaginable—flying across the Atlantic or swimming the English Channel, or becoming the most active, passionate First Lady the country had ever (and has ever) witnessed.

Miranda is based on women I’ve met and women I’ve known and women I’ve read about. She’s got a lot in common with Martha Gellhorn, another beautiful, tough, and hard-drinking woman who happened to be one of the best journalists and writers of the era (and Hemingway’s third wife). Martha was passionate about the things Miranda is passionate about.

So yeah, Miranda’s a woman of her era … and any era.

6. What’s next for her?

Well, City of Spiders comes out late summer or early fall of 2011. That’s the working title. It begins on May 25th, 1940, opening day of World’s Fair on Treasure Island. It deals with a brutal murder at the Fair, anti-Semitism, and fascist groups in the Bay Area. A number of characters in City of Dragons are making appearances, but I’m not telling who …

7. How much can you tell us about Miranda’s future?

Hmm. Well, if I’m very, very lucky, I’ll be able to keep writing her into the war and beyond. I’d like to see her become involved with the Cold War, particularly the Alger Hiss case. And she won’t always stay in San Francisco for some of this, obviously, but it will always be her home. 

8. What about The Curse-Maker? Any further adventures for Arcturus?

I was really lucky to have my first series picked up by Thomas Dunne/Minotaur. My debut novel, Nox Dormienda, was published with a small press, and it’s rare these days for a major to pick up a series started elsewhere. So I’d love to continue the series if The Curse-Maker does well enough. It’s a bit on the creepy side of noir … deals with Roman beliefs in the supernatural, features a necromancer and some nasty murders.

9. Favorite Latin phrase?

I’m partial to a bit of fake Latin popularized in WWII: Illegitimi non carborundum. For real Latin, I like ad augusta per angusta [to honors through alleys], or literally to high places through narrow ones. Sounds right for a noir writer.

10. You wear a lot of hats … what’s your favorite?

That’s a little like asking which is my favorite series or what’s my favorite book. I have so many … vintage fedoras, gifts given to me by friends. Probably the one that’s my personal, secret favorite, though, is my writing fedora, which (of course) I never wear in public. I wear it when I write to let my family know not to talk to me. It’s a beat-up, brown vintage Champ fedora, with moth holes and a crooked brim. It’s seen me through four books, and I consider it a good luck charm. :)

http://kellistanley.com/


http://tinyurl.com/3x5hrmn