Seventy Times Seven (US) is billed on the cover as ‘one of the
finest debuts of the decade’. To my
mind, it really isn’t that. It might be
better seen as the debut of a writer who shows a fair amount of potential
within the thriller genre.
It tells the story Danny Maguire who has worked in parallel
with the IRA in the nineties, but never been one of their ranks. He’s a killer and has been since the death of
his brother Sean. Danny’s resolved to
revenge his brother’s death and the opportunity arises when information emerges
about the identity of the key players from the time. It’s a journey that will take him to America,
where we’ve already witnessed a number of attempts on the life of Danny’s new
target.
The idea of the story is a strong one and it’s easy to see
why Sinclair was offered a publishing deal on its basis.
The main positive of the book for me is the skeleton of the
story; as a storyboard or in synopsis, there’s a lot to like about the way
Sinclair plays things out. The way it
keeps switching location and characters to reveal aspects of the plot is pretty
well handled. It has some of the energy
and the drive that one would want from such a book and the core issues are left
well-disguised right up until the points at which they are revealed.
The book also describes violence in a realistic way and
avoids creating any romantic notions of pain and death. It also has some pleasing humour running
through it that provides a good deal of entertaining material.
I get the feeling that there’s also been a lot of research
involved with this project and that creates a believable foundation to the
piece, though at times the insertion of such information might be a little
crude.
Where I think the work falls down a little and reveals the
author’s lack of experience in novel writing is with the pacing, the dialogue
and the way the key information is pointed out a little too boldly (at least
for my taste).
Essentially the book could be shorter and, with a good edit,
leaner and meaner (while still maintaining the warmer elements of the
relationships and the very human perspective on ‘The Troubles).
Some of the description is heavy-handed. There are too many strings of adjectives which
slow things down imperceptibly in a similar way that the friction caused by tiny
air molecules will eventually bring a moving object to a halt.
Here’s a small illustration:
‘The bed looked deep and comfortable with large sky-blue
satin pillows resting against its tall, pink-velvet button-fronted headrest.’
There’s nothing wrong in this, but the bed plays little or
no part in the scene and it could be much plainer and slicker.
My thought on the dialogue is that the characters need to be
more distinctive. Everyone has a very
witty repartee that shows off that talent for humour and this might be worthy
of attention. There’s also rather a lot
of exposition through the conversation and it’s a little clunky in that way:
‘God that seems like it was about two weeks ago,’ replied
Marie. ‘It’s hard to believe that was only two days ago.’
With a little attention Sinclair’s dialogue could be a real
strength – there’s a thin line here that shouldn’t take much to get across it.
Here’s another example of something that could be ironed out
in an edit. It identifies a lot of
things that are stated as obvious when they’re not – a little show-not-tell
might not go amiss:
‘It was obvious from her expression that checking people in
and out of the Lakeshore Hotel didn’t require too many qualifications.’
I wonder what the expression actually was – I’ve been practising
in the mirror, but don’t think I’ve mastered it yet.
All-in-all, it’s a mixed bag. Lots to please a reader and enough room for
improvement to suggest that Sinclair has what it takes to make it as a thriller
writer if he’s prepared to work on a thing or two. I know
that there’s a second novel on its way at some point and do feel that is likely
to step up on this. Writing is a craft
and those skills can only be learned through the doing and by being
well-mentored and with these things in place I think that Sinclair can move on
up the ladder at a fair rate.
Is he the same guy who used to be an actor?
ReplyDeleteGood, fair review!
ReplyDelete